| John Read, Loren 
            Mosher, Richard Bentall, eds.: Brunner-Routledge, 
            2004ISBN 1583919066 pp. 400 UK19.99 
             This is mandatory reading for all psychiatrists. It shakes many 
            of the shibboleths of psychiatry and does so with some sound 
            science. Its purpose is to undermine the biogenetic paradigm of 
            schizophrenia and this end is pursued relentlessly, beginning with a 
            thorough critique of the original Kraeplinian formulation, moving 
            through the twin studies and then the neuroanatomical and 
            neurophysiological evidence. 
            Having undermined this foundation to the 'schizophrenia is a 
            brain disease and it's in your genes and you need medication for 
            life' approach, the editors then address the positive data for the 
            psychosocial factors. Again a very convincing broadside is fired at 
            received wisdoms, such as that prevalence is the same across 
            cultures and supports the theory that schizophrenia is a medical 
            condition. In particular I liked the parody of social drift 
            theory   'schizophrenics don't become Irish'. The data on 
            child abuse and its association with schizophrenia is thoroughly 
            compiled in a convincing array. 
            The weakness of the thesis comes with the data on psychological 
            remedies but   although 
            the editors don't grapple with this   I think this deficit is explained by the 
            thesis itself: If schizophrenia is not a valid diagnostic entity, 
            then reviewing treatment outcomes could not yield useful information 
            because there may be several different disturbances subsumed under 
            that rubric. The authors do present good data to suggest that the 
            three symptoms groups, delusions and hallucinations, thought 
            disorder and negative symptoms have no particular association with 
            each other, so treatment outcomes are unlikely to make sense unless 
            these groups are dealt with separately. Indeed this is suggested by 
            the fact that cognitive therapy makes delusions and hallucinations 
            better but negative symptoms worse. 
            The editors undoubtedly have a selective bias in terms of the 
            data they have critiqued but that is hardly new in this particular 
            field and compared to the selective filter through which mainstream 
            psychiatric research is promulgated, it is hardly an issue. For the 
            'schizophrenia is a brain disease' theorists and the 'it's in your 
            genes, families are blameless and it has nothing to do with 
            childhood experience' theorists: read this book and re-examine your 
            tenets. 
            Read et al. have issued a serious challenge to 
            psychiatry. Are we totally on the wrong track with both 
            understanding and treating schizophrenia? Are we doing more to 
            create mental disorder than to prevent it? Since we have shuffled 
            off responsibility for almost everything except mental illness, this 
            challenge to the medical model suggests that we may have sawn off 
            the last branch on which we had any purchase.  |